Re: [pgsql-patches] Ctid chain following enhancement

Patch rejected, not held for 8.4, because it uglifies the code.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> On 1/28/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > OTOH it might be
> > cleaner to refactor things that way, if we were going to apply this.
> >
> >
> Here is a revised patch which includes refactoring of
> heap_get_latest_tid(), as per Tom's suggestion.
>
> Thanks,
> Pavan
>
> --
>
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +