Re: Ctid chain following enhancement

From: "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ctid chain following enhancement
Date: 2007-01-29 07:19:33
Message-ID: 2e78013d0701282319g595c3cb7x44289ac1264103@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On 1/28/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> OTOH it might be
> cleaner to refactor things that way, if we were going to apply this.
>
>
Here is a revised patch which includes refactoring of
heap_get_latest_tid(), as per Tom's suggestion.

Thanks,
Pavan

--

EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
cf-enhance-head-v2.patch application/octet-stream 4.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-01-29 12:58:56 pg_dump missing arguments in docs
Previous Message David Fetter 2007-01-28 23:36:11 Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was