| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-patches] Ctid chain following enhancement |
| Date: | 2007-06-01 21:11:36 |
| Message-ID: | 200706012111.l51LBac04678@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I think it should be dropped entirely. The argument against was that
> >> it complicated the code in a non-performance-critical path, and that
> >> argument isn't going to be different next time.
>
> > I only kept it for 8.4 because I was worried it might be needed for HOT
> > performance.
>
> No such argument has been made in my hearing, and I can't imagine why
> either of the functions touched by the patch would be more
> performance-critical for HOT than they are today.
OK, removed from 8.4 queue.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-06-01 22:54:04 | Re: [HACKERS] like/ilike improvements |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-06-01 21:10:04 | Re: [pgsql-patches] Ctid chain following enhancement |