From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |
Date: | 2006-09-04 02:11:40 |
Message-ID: | 200609040211.k842BeL00837@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 03:40:40PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > This is also an interesting example for a tracker. If we had one, all
> > discussion on the patch would be in one place, but I am thinking that
> > would require all posting to happen in a browser, or somehow have emails
> > tagged to attach to each item. Is that something that can happen
> > easily? I don't know. Would the repost of a patch be attached to the
> > original submission?
>
> In debbugs for example, the bug gets an email address
> <bugnumber>@bugs.project.site. Anything sent to that address gets
> recorded in the bug. So as long as people hit "reply-to-all" the whole
> thread will be archived in the bug.
>
> I assume other bug trackers have a similar feature...
Oh, so the bug is tracked by being part of the email reply list. That
is a good idea. Now, how does that get assigned for non-bugs, like
patches? Does any email sent to the lists that doesn't already have a
bug number get one? That might be really valuable.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-04 02:13:41 | Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-04 02:10:05 | Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |