From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Satoshi Nagayasu <nagayasus(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp |
Subject: | Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes |
Date: | 2006-09-04 02:13:41 |
Message-ID: | 8453.1157336021@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Satoshi Nagayasu <nagayasus(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> pgstatindex.c: In function 'bt_page_items':
>> pgstatindex.c:564: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int'
> I guess my '%d' should be '%zd', right?
No, that sounds even less portable :-(
Given the expected range of IndexTupleSize(), it seems sufficient to
cast its result to int and then use %d formatting. I've done that
in the latest commit.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2006-09-04 02:15:19 | On Certification (was Re: [GENERAL] Thought provoking piece on NetBSD) |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-04 02:11:40 | Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-04 02:21:11 | Re: [HACKERS] Interval month, week -> day |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-09-04 02:09:08 | Re: [HACKERS] python / 7.4 / FC5 / x86_64 |