| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |
| Date: | 2006-09-04 02:10:05 |
| Message-ID: | 200609040210.k842A5t00763@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Without a reply from Peter, I have to assume the patch is valid.
>
> To make it more explicit: I think the patch is stupid, but if someone
> wants to review it, go ahead. But I am not comfortable with the "if no
> one objects, I'll just commit it" mode that is sometimes going on. Has
> anyone actually tested the patch?
Are you saying you don't like the patch, or the goal of resetting the
value to their defaults when they are commented out? If the first, do
you have a suggestion, if the later, it is something confuses many
users.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-04 02:11:40 | Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-09-04 02:09:08 | Re: [HACKERS] python / 7.4 / FC5 / x86_64 |