| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Subject: | Re: Windows 2000 Support |
| Date: | 2006-08-18 23:47:39 |
| Message-ID: | 200608190147.40514.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Yeah, that's better wording. Or more correct I think "Windows 2000
> SP4 or above".
>
> FWIW, MS has officially said at some point that they will not make
> SP5 for Windows 2000, but they've changed their minds before...
Unless there actually is a version of that operating system that is not
labelled "Windows 2000 SP4" that is supported, this expression is
meaningless.
Note that the list of "supported" platforms in the documentation does
not make any open interval claims (or any interval claims for that
matter).
If you know that anything before Windows 2000 SP4 is unsupported, that
would be useful information, but not the other way around.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-19 01:50:03 | Re: Information_schema fixes for sequences and temporary tables |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2006-08-18 23:45:18 | Information_schema fixes for sequences and temporary tables |