Re: Windows 2000 Support

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Yeah, that's better wording. Or more correct I think "Windows 2000
> > SP4 or above".
> >
> > FWIW, MS has officially said at some point that they will not make
> > SP5 for Windows 2000, but they've changed their minds before...
>
> Unless there actually is a version of that operating system that is not
> labelled "Windows 2000 SP4" that is supported, this expression is
> meaningless.
>
> Note that the list of "supported" platforms in the documentation does
> not make any open interval claims (or any interval claims for that
> matter).
>
> If you know that anything before Windows 2000 SP4 is unsupported, that
> would be useful information, but not the other way around.

I see who mentions of Win2000, one in the FAQ, another in the release
notes. If people want the text changed, I want an example showing exactly
what the new wording should be because you can't just add "and later"
into the text we have now.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +