| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Windows 2000 Support |
| Date: | 2006-08-18 17:12:42 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FB48@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > I am worried that saying required means it only works for that
> > version, while it might work for SP5 if that is ever released.
> >
> How about:
>
> Windows 2000 SP4 and above required.
Yeah, that's better wording. Or more correct I think "Windows 2000 SP4
or above".
FWIW, MS has officially said at some point that they will not make SP5
for Windows 2000, but they've changed their minds before...
> I know it seems trivial, but the amount of people that run
> windows.... I really don't want to spend a ton of time with
> the question: I see that Sp4 is supported, what about SP3? :)
Well, SP3 isn't supported ;-)
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2006-08-18 17:16:40 | Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using |
| Previous Message | Naz Gassiep | 2006-08-18 17:02:26 | Re: pg_dump schema breakup |