Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful

On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 06:28:31PM -0000, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
>
> One thing that came up in the discussion here was the idea of a
> weekly (or other time period) digest of patches posts, stripped of
> attachments, but with a link to the patches email, which will have
> both the attachment and follow-up posts for those that are
> interested. Proof of concept below my sig.

I've done a little bit of this in the form of short summaries in the
Weekly News, and I'd be delighted to do more of it. I'd need some
help, though :)

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!