| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful |
| Date: | 2006-07-11 23:20:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20060711202009.W957@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Greg Stark wrote:
> I have the additional complaint that this doesn't actually solve most of
> my original complaints and might reduce the pressure to find a better
> solution. The patches announcements themselves would still be basically
> invisible within the community.
How do you deal with the case where someone posts a patch, but it isn't an
attachment? Its part of the actual text?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2006-07-11 23:22:41 | Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-07-11 23:17:47 | Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful |