From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |
Date: | 2006-07-11 23:29:54 |
Message-ID: | 200607111629.54749.jd@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I'm afraid there's not much in the PL/Java type system that could be
> generalized and shared. Perhaps if we had other languages with very
> similar capabilities (like C# for instance) but even then I have some
> doubts. The good news in my opinion is that if PL/Java would make it to
> the core it could make a good reference implementation for other equally
> advanced language mappings.
What is the actual concern with having PL/Java in core, versus say PL/Perl?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Regards,
> Thomas Hallgren
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-07-11 23:32:21 | Re: More nuclear options |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2006-07-11 23:22:41 | Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful |