Re: Removing AddDepends; should I bother with a project?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Removing AddDepends; should I bother with a project?
Date: 2006-07-10 19:28:45
Message-ID: 20060710192845.GB27385@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gavin Sherry wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > For the code sprint, I'm starting off by removing the projects from
> > > contrib which need to be removed by still have some usefulness. I'm not
> > > exactly sure what to do with adddepends, though. It seems unlike to
> > > lead an independent existence on pgFoundry; I'm inclined to just nuke it.
> >
> > I vote for the nuclear option. ;-)
>
> There are still 7.2 systems out there which need it. The problem is,
> adddepend is broken when run against 8.1. It breaks on serial, I think.

Which is not really a problem, because it seems actually kinda absurd to
be running adddepend against an 8.1 server. I mean, if you spent all
that time running with broken FKs and stuff from 7.2 to 8.1, why are you
going to care now?

I don't think it would be very difficult to solve the problem with
serial anyway.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2006-07-10 19:31:37 Re: Warm-Standby using WAL archiving / Seperate pg_restorelog application
Previous Message mark 2006-07-10 19:22:41 Re: A couple thoughts about btree fillfactor