Re: Removing AddDepends; should I bother with a project?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Removing AddDepends; should I bother with a project?
Date: 2006-07-10 19:44:17
Message-ID: 44B2AE11.6050006@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gavin,

>>There are still 7.2 systems out there which need it. The problem is,
>>adddepend is broken when run against 8.1. It breaks on serial, I think.

And on some other stuff, too. I didn't document all the failures, I
just tested and killed it.

Think is, 8.1 does a much better job of upgrading 7.2 datatabases than
7.3 or 7.4 did anyway. I just tested using a database created in 7.1
and upgraded to 7.2 which has a baroque and unnecessarily complex schema
(legacy production applicaiton) which breaks on 7.4 without adddepends.
I was able to upgrade it to 8.2(today) and it worked without adddepends.

I'm testing dump, load, dump, load now to see if it still works OK.

--Josh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2006-07-10 19:44:41 More nuclear options
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2006-07-10 19:31:37 Re: Warm-Standby using WAL archiving / Seperate pg_restorelog application