From: | mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: A couple thoughts about btree fillfactor |
Date: | 2006-07-10 19:22:41 |
Message-ID: | 20060710192240.GA20314@mark.mielke.cc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 03:17:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc writes:
> > ... Do you think there should be a way of packing certain
> > indexes tighter, once they are known to be mostly read only? For
> > example, an option on REINDEX? This would free PostgreSQL to use a
> > smaller fillfactor while still allowing people to optimize those of
> > their tables that would benefit from a higher fillfactor once they
> > become mostly static?
> Isn't it sufficient to change the fillfactor and REINDEX?
I've never tried that - if it works sure... :-)
Thanks,
mark
--
mark(at)mielke(dot)cc / markm(at)ncf(dot)ca / markm(at)nortel(dot)com __________________________
. . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ |
| | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-07-10 19:28:45 | Re: Removing AddDepends; should I bother with a project? |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-07-10 19:20:33 | Re: Removing AddDepends; should I bother with a project? |