Re: A couple thoughts about btree fillfactor

From: mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A couple thoughts about btree fillfactor
Date: 2006-07-10 19:22:41
Message-ID: 20060710192240.GA20314@mark.mielke.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 03:17:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc writes:
> > ... Do you think there should be a way of packing certain
> > indexes tighter, once they are known to be mostly read only? For
> > example, an option on REINDEX? This would free PostgreSQL to use a
> > smaller fillfactor while still allowing people to optimize those of
> > their tables that would benefit from a higher fillfactor once they
> > become mostly static?
> Isn't it sufficient to change the fillfactor and REINDEX?

I've never tried that - if it works sure... :-)

Thanks,
mark

--
mark(at)mielke(dot)cc / markm(at)ncf(dot)ca / markm(at)nortel(dot)com __________________________
. . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ |
| | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them...

http://mark.mielke.cc/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-07-10 19:28:45 Re: Removing AddDepends; should I bother with a project?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-07-10 19:20:33 Re: Removing AddDepends; should I bother with a project?