Re: Removing AddDepends; should I bother with a project?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Removing AddDepends; should I bother with a project?
Date: 2006-07-10 19:20:33
Message-ID: 200607101220.33868.jd@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Monday 10 July 2006 11:43, Gavin Sherry wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > For the code sprint, I'm starting off by removing the projects from
> > > contrib which need to be removed by still have some usefulness. I'm
> > > not exactly sure what to do with adddepends, though. It seems unlike
> > > to lead an independent existence on pgFoundry; I'm inclined to just
> > > nuke it.
> >
> > I vote for the nuclear option. ;-)
>
> There are still 7.2 systems out there which need it.

My understanding is that 7.2 is EOL... if people have 7.2 and need it they can
pull the sources from anythin <= 8.2 yes?

So I vote nuke!

Joshua D. Drake

> The problem is,
> adddepend is broken when run against 8.1. It breaks on serial, I think.
>
> Gavin
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mark 2006-07-10 19:22:41 Re: A couple thoughts about btree fillfactor
Previous Message Phil Frost 2006-07-10 19:18:28 Re: lastval exposes information that currval does not