| From: | Kris Kennaway <kris(at)obsecurity(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kris Kennaway <kris(at)obsecurity(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: postgresql and process titles |
| Date: | 2006-06-13 18:18:03 |
| Message-ID: | 20060613181803.GA5042@xor.obsecurity.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 12:29:14PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Unless supersmack has improved substantially, you're unlikely to find
> much interest. Last I heard it was a pretty brain-dead benchmark. DBT2/3
> (http://sourceforge.net/projects/osdldbt) is much more realistic (based
> on TPC-C and TPC-H).
Have you tried to compile this on FreeBSD? It looks like it (dbt1 at
least) will need a moderate amount of hacking - there are some Linux
assumptions in the source and the configure script makes assumptions
about where things are installed that cannot be overridden on the
commandline.
Kris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-06-13 19:21:53 | Re: postgresql and process titles |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-06-13 18:10:15 | Re: postgresql and process titles |