Re: postgresql and process titles

From: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Kris Kennaway <kris(at)obsecurity(dot)org>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql and process titles
Date: 2006-06-16 03:34:52
Message-ID: 1150428892.777.498.camel@home
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 14:18 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 12:29:14PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>
> > Unless supersmack has improved substantially, you're unlikely to find
> > much interest. Last I heard it was a pretty brain-dead benchmark. DBT2/3
> > (http://sourceforge.net/projects/osdldbt) is much more realistic (based
> > on TPC-C and TPC-H).
>
> Have you tried to compile this on FreeBSD? It looks like it (dbt1 at
> least) will need a moderate amount of hacking - there are some Linux
> assumptions in the source and the configure script makes assumptions
> about where things are installed that cannot be overridden on the
> commandline.

I did have dbt2 pretty close to functional on FreeBSD a year ago but
it's probably gone back into linuxisms since then.
--

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-06-16 03:39:46 Re: Re-thing PG_MODULE_MAGIC
Previous Message Qingqing Zhou 2006-06-16 03:27:50 Re: Test request for Stats collector performance improvement