Re: postgresql and process titles

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris(at)obsecurity(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql and process titles
Date: 2006-06-13 18:10:15
Message-ID: 200606131810.k5DIAFW25194@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> FWIW, getting turning off stats_command_string substantially reduced
> this contention, so it appears the issue is somewhere in the stats code.
> This code sends stats messages to a different process via a socket (or
> is it UDP?), with the intention that if the system gets heavily loaded
> we'll lose some stats in the interest of not bogging down all the
> backends. It seems that doesn't work so hot on FreeBSD. :(

I am working on a patch for 8.2 to fix that for all platforms.

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Kennaway 2006-06-13 18:18:03 Re: postgresql and process titles
Previous Message brian ally 2006-06-13 17:50:33 Re: Fabian Pascal and RDBMS deficiencies in fully