Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?
Date: 2005-10-07 16:08:29
Message-ID: 20051007160829.GA10366@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:56:50AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> > No, because you can't overload based purely on return type. I suppose
> > they could write it to take an int8 pid or something, but that's a hack.
>
> Well, how many people want to vote for Andreas' suggestion of having
> both
>
> int pg_cancel_backend(int)
> bool pg_backend_cancel(int)
>
> with the former deprecated but still there for backward compatibility?

+1

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/DXLWNGRJD34
"Siempre hay que alimentar a los dioses, aunque la tierra esté seca" (Orual)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anjali.Sinha 2005-10-07 16:12:38 Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-10-07 16:06:41 Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?