| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? |
| Date: | 2005-10-07 16:19:21 |
| Message-ID: | 1128701961.3497.2.camel@jd.commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 12:08 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:56:50AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > > No, because you can't overload based purely on return type. I suppose
> > > they could write it to take an int8 pid or something, but that's a hack.
> >
> > Well, how many people want to vote for Andreas' suggestion of having
> > both
> >
> > int pg_cancel_backend(int)
> > bool pg_backend_cancel(int)
> >
> > with the former deprecated but still there for backward compatibility?
>
> +1
I would vote for this "if" we deprecate the old one and say that it will
be removed for 8.2.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2005-10-07 16:22:14 | Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? |
| Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2005-10-07 16:13:44 | Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? |