| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? |
| Date: | 2005-10-07 17:06:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20051007140626.L1477@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 12:08 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:56:50AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>>> No, because you can't overload based purely on return type. I suppose
>>>> they could write it to take an int8 pid or something, but that's a hack.
>>>
>>> Well, how many people want to vote for Andreas' suggestion of having
>>> both
>>>
>>> int pg_cancel_backend(int)
>>> bool pg_backend_cancel(int)
>>>
>>> with the former deprecated but still there for backward compatibility?
>>
>> +1
>
> I would vote for this "if" we deprecate the old one and say that it will
> be removed for 8.2.
Agreed 100% ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-10-07 17:07:45 | Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-10-07 17:06:15 | Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? |