Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?

Unsubscribe me. Or Can anyone forward me the emailId of the concerned
person..??

Regards,
Anjali Sinha
ASCG, Reliance Infocomm
J Block, SB-11, 2nd Floor,
Dhirubhai Ambani Knowledge City,
Thane Belapur Road, New Mumbai India, 400 709
DID: 91 22 30387862
____________________________________________

Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)or To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
g> cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Robert Treat
Sent by: <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, (bcc: Anjali
pgsql-hackers-owner(at)pos Sinha/INFOCOMM/RIL)
tgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?
Importance: Normal Sender's OU: Reliance |------------------|
| [ ] Confidential |
10/07/2005 09:38 PM |------------------|

On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:56:50AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> > No, because you can't overload based purely on return type. I suppose
> > they could write it to take an int8 pid or something, but that's a
hack.
>
> Well, how many people want to vote for Andreas' suggestion of having
> both
>
> int pg_cancel_backend(int)
> bool pg_backend_cancel(int)
>
> with the former deprecated but still there for backward compatibility?

+1

--
Alvaro Herrera
http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/DXLWNGRJD34
"Siempre hay que alimentar a los dioses, aunque la tierra esté seca"
(Orual)

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings