From: | Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgbuildfarm-members(at)pgfoundry(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] log archiving and copmpression |
Date: | 2005-07-23 22:12:28 |
Message-ID: | 20050723221228.GA27705@gp.word-to-the-wise.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | buildfarm-members |
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 05:34:05PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I am looking at archiving and compressing the collected logs, in
> preparation for uploading the entire set to the server, to meet Tom
> Lane's request.
>
> A single uncompressed log set is nearly 700Kb on my test box, but
> collected and compressed using 'tar -z' it comes to about 56Kb. However,
> I don't know if every machine will have GNU tar with zlib compression
> available. Should I just go ahead and send individual files and not
> worry about bandwidth? Or is there a better portable solution?
gtar isn't necessarily available. I know some of my boxes (not in the
buildfarm now, but they may be soon) don't have it.
"tar cf - files | gzip >foo.tar.gz" is likely to be much more portable. There's
probably a machine out there that only has compress, but...
On the other hand, 700k is a little less than 4 seconds on a T1 or about
45 seconds on the lowest of low end DSL lines. I always try and save
bandwidth, but if this looks like it'll be a problem it's not a big deal.
Cheers,
Steve
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-07-23 22:14:26 | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] log archiving and copmpression |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-07-23 21:53:34 | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] log archiving and copmpression |