Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images

From: Holger Klawitter <lists(at)klawitter(dot)de>
To: Postgres Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images
Date: 2004-04-13 10:56:09
Message-ID: 200404131256.15356.lists@klawitter.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

> imho other filesystems like reiser have some version-problems ;)

Oh please. Reiser is as unstable as postgres is slow - in other words, both
have to suffer prejudice which used to be true loooong ago. ;-)

In cases of large directories ext2/3 perform extremely bad (as in the original
post) So this guy will be better off with anything but ext2/3. That's why I
switched from ext2 to reiser ~2 years ago (without any problems since).

Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards
Holger Klawitter
- --
lists <at> klawitter <dot> de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAe8dP1Xdt0HKSwgYRAkLqAJ4vmqkDGkFYDL67aPMAK6qGAavEQgCfekvV
JCht52XAoXE8DrbXX24B8gc=
=XjOz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Victor Spång Arthursson 2004-04-13 12:17:27 convert result to uppercase
Previous Message Development - multi.art.studio 2004-04-13 10:12:49 performance problem aftrer update from 7.1 to 7.4.2