| From: | "Mattias Kregert" <mattias(at)kregert(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Postgres Mailing List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images |
| Date: | 2004-04-13 14:26:33 |
| Message-ID: | 005d01c42163$5225bba0$09000a0a@kregert.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Hi,
>
> > imho other filesystems like reiser have some version-problems ;)
>
> Oh please. Reiser is as unstable as postgres is slow - in other words, both
> have to suffer prejudice which used to be true loooong ago. ;-)
>
> In cases of large directories ext2/3 perform extremely bad (as in the original
> post) So this guy will be better off with anything but ext2/3. That's why I
> switched from ext2 to reiser ~2 years ago (without any problems since).
>
> Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards
> Holger Klawitter
> - --
I use reiserfs, too. Large directories (hundreds of thousand files) does not slow down file retrival, and i never had any problems with stability.
/Mattias
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-04-13 14:36:05 | Re: verifying unicode locale support |
| Previous Message | Anton Nikiforov | 2004-04-13 14:24:13 | Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images |