Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images

From: "Holger Hoffstaette" <spam(at)wizards(dot)de>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Filesystem vs. Postgres for images
Date: 2004-04-13 21:40:24
Message-ID: pan.2004.04.13.21.40.22.360000@wizards.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 12:56:09 +0200, Holger Klawitter wrote:

> Oh please. Reiser is as unstable as postgres is slow - in other words,
> both have to suffer prejudice which used to be true loooong ago. ;-)

True.

> In cases of large directories ext2/3 perform extremely bad (as in the
> original post) So this guy will be better off with anything but ext2/3.

"Oh please."

- umount /dev/xxx
- tune2fs -O dir_index dev/xxx
- fsck -f -D /dev/hdxx
- mount /dev/xxx

> That's why I switched from ext2 to reiser ~2 years ago (without any
> problems since).

Time marches on. :-)

Holger

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-04-13 22:20:16 Remove MySQL Tools from Source?
Previous Message Chris Kratz 2004-04-13 21:20:03 Re: insert rule not firing on insert with exists subselect