| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Log rotation |
| Date: | 2004-03-24 17:31:48 |
| Message-ID: | 200403241731.i2OHVmL24148@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> This thread seems to have died without a conclusion. AFAICS, we have 5
> options:
>
> . the apache program - see below
> pro: robust, portable, extremely well tested, no effort to import
> con: possible license issues, limited features
> . Peter Eisentraut's program
> pro: portable, better featured, no license issues
> con: code state uncertain, less well tested
> . the Afilias script
> pro: well featured, no license issues
> con: not portable (relies on perl), testing status uncertain
> . something new
> pro: no license issues, can make as featured as desired, portable
> con: lots of effort, untested
> . nothing
> pro: no effort, no license issues :-)
> con: feature is desired
>
> The issues seem to have been thrashed out ad nauseam. Surely we can put
> *something* in contrib for this? After all, nobody has to use it if they
> don't want to.
Shouldn't all of these just be on gborg?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2004-03-24 17:37:40 | Re: pg_advisor schema proof of concept |
| Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2004-03-24 17:15:41 | Re: pg_advisor schema proof of concept |