On Wednesday 24 March 2004 15:52, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >> If plpgsql works OK, I say stick with it.
> >
> > Hmmm. I'm not very happy with plpgsql,
>
> I don't know where you are planning on going with this. If it's only to
> be a contrib tool, it's okay to depend on plpgsql. But we couldn't
> incorporate it into the base system because plpgsql isn't part of the
> base system.
So Tom, are you suggesting:
1. A core in the base distribution (C / SQL)
2. command-line tool in the base distro (pg_advisor)
3. more open project (gborg?) to let people design/add tests, some of which
will eventually end up in the standard set in the base distro.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd