Re: pg_advisor schema proof of concept

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_advisor schema proof of concept
Date: 2004-03-24 17:37:40
Message-ID: 200403241737.40735.dev@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wednesday 24 March 2004 15:52, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >> If plpgsql works OK, I say stick with it.
> >
> > Hmmm. I'm not very happy with plpgsql,
>
> I don't know where you are planning on going with this. If it's only to
> be a contrib tool, it's okay to depend on plpgsql. But we couldn't
> incorporate it into the base system because plpgsql isn't part of the
> base system.

So Tom, are you suggesting:
1. A core in the base distribution (C / SQL)
2. command-line tool in the base distro (pg_advisor)
3. more open project (gborg?) to let people design/add tests, some of which
will eventually end up in the standard set in the base distro.

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-24 18:00:32 My chat addresses
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-24 17:31:48 Re: Log rotation