From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Log rotation |
Date: | 2004-03-25 15:05:16 |
Message-ID: | 200403251005.16485.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 12:31, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > This thread seems to have died without a conclusion. AFAICS, we have 5
> > options:
> >
> > . the apache program - see below
> > pro: robust, portable, extremely well tested, no effort to import
> > con: possible license issues, limited features
> > . Peter Eisentraut's program
> > pro: portable, better featured, no license issues
> > con: code state uncertain, less well tested
> > . the Afilias script
> > pro: well featured, no license issues
> > con: not portable (relies on perl), testing status uncertain
> > . something new
> > pro: no license issues, can make as featured as desired, portable
> > con: lots of effort, untested
> > . nothing
> > pro: no effort, no license issues :-)
> > con: feature is desired
> >
> > The issues seem to have been thrashed out ad nauseam. Surely we can put
> > *something* in contrib for this? After all, nobody has to use it if they
> > don't want to.
>
> Shouldn't all of these just be on gborg?
Some could simply be an article/guide on techdocs and/or a chapter in the
docs... "how to use postgresql with apache logrotate" for example
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Schuchardt | 2004-03-25 15:15:55 | Re: Delphi |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-03-25 15:02:03 | Re: Email addresses on developer bios site |