Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Peter,
>
> > Btw., what process is used to determine which organizations become a
> > "recognised contributor"?
>
> Yeah, that's another "ToDo" item ... your company needs to go up there.
>
> Criteria are major code contributions and/or sponsoring a full-time developer.
> We've discussed it on -CORE some, but not come to a specific determination of
> the level required. However, between you & M & LinuxWorld etc. your
> company definitely qualifies.

I don't think the developers have to be full-time, like me and Tom. Any
company that consistently contributes developer time for items other
than "we need a feature" should be listed, I think. Peter, for example,
isn't full-time PostgreSQL, but is contributing greatly, and Command
Prompt has offered to contribute a developer toward Win32 --- I am
seeing more and more of these folks coming around, and it is beefing up
our development team. We can help these companies also by providing
speaking and trade show opportunities.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073