Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >>I think we had agreed that formerly-listed contributors would not be
> >>deleted, but would be moved to a new section titled "Contributors
> >>Emeritus" or some such. Please make sure that Tom Lockhart and Vadim
> >>get listed that way, at least.
> >
> > I think the "Emeritus" word might be too hard for non-native English
> > speakers, and even for less educated English speakers.
>
> Isn't that an even better reason to use it? :)

That reminds me of this:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

0x0d2C
==========

May your signals all trap
May your references be bounded
All memory aligned
Floats to ints rounded

Remember ...

Non-zero is true
++ adds one
Arrays start with zero
and, NULL is for none

For octal, use zero
0x means hex
= will set
== means test

use -> for a pointer
a dot if its not
? : is confusing
use them a lot <----

a.out is your program
there's no U in foobar
and, char (*(*x())[])() is
a function returning a pointer
to an array of pointers to
functions returning char

-- Jon S. Stumpf

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073