| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Still a few flaws in configure's default CFLAGS selection |
| Date: | 2003-10-16 18:52:55 |
| Message-ID: | 200310161852.h9GIqtA02521@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > Also, I thought Peter advocated adding -g a few releases back. I didn't
> > > agree, but I lost the vote, so I thought it was done. Were we
> > > supresssing -g in older releases? Peter?
> >
> > I don't recall any such vote. Had we done that, we'd have removed
> > --enable-debug, I'd think.
>
> The vote was whether -g should be used for a default compile. Of course
> --enable-debug would continue using -g. Maybe we kept --enable-debug
> for backward compatibility or to force -g if you modified CFLAGS?
Here is the thread discussing the -g flag:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-04/msg00281.php
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-16 18:54:06 | Re: Still a few flaws in configure's default CFLAGS selection |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-16 18:18:27 | Re: Still a few flaws in configure's default CFLAGS selection |