From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Still a few flaws in configure's default CFLAGS selection |
Date: | 2003-10-16 18:18:27 |
Message-ID: | 12413.1066328307@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> The vote was whether -g should be used for a default compile. Of course
> --enable-debug would continue using -g. Maybe we kept --enable-debug
> for backward compatibility or to force -g if you modified CFLAGS?
I can't see why we would have kept --enable-debug if we intended to make
-g be default anyway. Backwards compatibility is not an issue, because
configure simply ignores --enable switches it doesn't recognize (another
questionable autoconf design decision, but I digress). And if you are
setting CFLAGS for yourself, you are surely capable of adding -g to it
if you want; why would you type seven times as much to accomplish the
same thing?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-16 18:52:55 | Re: Still a few flaws in configure's default CFLAGS selection |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-16 18:08:33 | Re: elog tab indentation |