Re: Still a few flaws in configure's default CFLAGS selection

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Still a few flaws in configure's default CFLAGS selection
Date: 2003-10-16 18:02:03
Message-ID: 200310161802.h9GI23l28382@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Also, I thought Peter advocated adding -g a few releases back. I didn't
> > agree, but I lost the vote, so I thought it was done. Were we
> > supresssing -g in older releases? Peter?
>
> I don't recall any such vote. Had we done that, we'd have removed
> --enable-debug, I'd think.

The vote was whether -g should be used for a default compile. Of course
--enable-debug would continue using -g. Maybe we kept --enable-debug
for backward compatibility or to force -g if you modified CFLAGS?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-10-16 18:08:33 Re: elog tab indentation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-16 17:58:37 Re: elog tab indentation