Re: Cygwin? or paid version from SRA?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David So <davidso(at)netband(dot)com(dot)hk>, Postgre General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cygwin? or paid version from SRA?
Date: 2003-10-15 14:28:57
Message-ID: 20031015142857.GA32014@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 09:14:09AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I think SRA's version has better performance because it is a native
> Windows version, rather than using Cygwin, and it does threading, rather
> than CreateProcess() to start each database session.

I asked SRA a month ago or so if they sold outside Japan, and was told
that "they were not ready yet". Are they getting ready?

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"La victoria es para quien se atreve a estar solo"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Patrick Hatcher 2003-10-15 14:35:25 Re: PLPERL function error - utf-8 to iso8859-1
Previous Message Errol Neal 2003-10-15 14:16:29 Porting Code to Postgresql