Re: Cygwin? or paid version from SRA?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: David So <davidso(at)netband(dot)com(dot)hk>, Postgre General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cygwin? or paid version from SRA?
Date: 2003-10-15 20:13:21
Message-ID: 200310152013.h9FKDLA11918@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 09:14:09AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > I think SRA's version has better performance because it is a native
> > Windows version, rather than using Cygwin, and it does threading, rather
> > than CreateProcess() to start each database session.
>
> I asked SRA a month ago or so if they sold outside Japan, and was told
> that "they were not ready yet". Are they getting ready?

No, I don't think so. The original poster had a .hk domain, so I assume
he is in Hong Kong, and they might sell there, but I am not 100% sure.

The big problem is that all the admin tools are only in Japanese, but I
am told they are working on that.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-10-15 20:56:50 Re: Getting error codes for failed queries?
Previous Message Gene Vital 2003-10-15 20:08:26 ODBC