Re: Cygwin? or paid version from SRA?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David So <davidso(at)netband(dot)com(dot)hk>
Cc: Postgre General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cygwin? or paid version from SRA?
Date: 2003-10-15 13:14:09
Message-ID: 200310151314.h9FDE9T10634@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

David So wrote:
> Hi All
>
>
>
> For deploying PostgreSQL on Windoz platform, which one is a better
> option (performance, reliability) ? Thru Cygwin or Paid version from
> SRA?

I think SRA's version has better performance because it is a native
Windows version, rather than using Cygwin, and it does threading, rather
than CreateProcess() to start each database session.

Of course, I work for SRA.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2003-10-15 13:22:19 Re: Cygwin? or paid version from SRA?
Previous Message Andreas Fromm 2003-10-15 12:38:02 Re: PG tools