Re: Perfomance Tuning

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Perfomance Tuning
Date: 2003-08-08 19:34:44
Message-ID: 200308081934.h78JYi906553@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Rod Taylor wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 14:53, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 09:40:20AM -0700, Jonathan Gardner wrote:
> > >
> > > Redhat puts ext3 on by default. Consider switching to a non-journaling FS
> > > (ext2?) with the partition that holds your data and WAL.
> >
> > I would give you exactly the opposite advice: _never_ use a
> > non-journalling fs for your data and WAL. I suppose if you can
> > afford to lose some transactions, you can do without journalling.
> > Otherwise, you're just borrowing trouble, near as I can tell.
>
> Agreed.. WAL cannot recover something when WAL no longer exists due to a
> filesystem corruption.

It is true that ext2 isn't good because the file system may not recover,
but BSD UFS isn't a journalled file system, but does guarantee file
system recovery after a crash --- it is especially good using soft
updates.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-08-08 19:46:44 Re: Perfomance Tuning
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2003-08-08 19:13:47 Re: Perfomance Tuning