Re: Perfomance Tuning

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
Cc: Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Perfomance Tuning
Date: 2003-08-08 19:13:47
Message-ID: 1060370026.97914.40.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 14:53, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 09:40:20AM -0700, Jonathan Gardner wrote:
> >
> > Redhat puts ext3 on by default. Consider switching to a non-journaling FS
> > (ext2?) with the partition that holds your data and WAL.
>
> I would give you exactly the opposite advice: _never_ use a
> non-journalling fs for your data and WAL. I suppose if you can
> afford to lose some transactions, you can do without journalling.
> Otherwise, you're just borrowing trouble, near as I can tell.

Agreed.. WAL cannot recover something when WAL no longer exists due to a
filesystem corruption.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-08-08 19:34:44 Re: Perfomance Tuning
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-08-08 18:53:23 Re: Perfomance Tuning