| From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Perfomance Tuning |
| Date: | 2003-08-08 19:56:58 |
| Message-ID: | 20030808195658.GJ2967@libertyrms.info |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 03:34:44PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> It is true that ext2 isn't good because the file system may not recover,
> but BSD UFS isn't a journalled file system, but does guarantee file
> system recovery after a crash --- it is especially good using soft
> updates.
Sorry. I usually write "journalled or equivalent" for this reason.
I think UFS with soft updates is a good example of this. You also
don't need complete journalling in most cases -- metadata is probably
sufficient, given fsync.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-08 20:13:47 | Re: Perfomance Tuning |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-08-08 19:46:44 | Re: Perfomance Tuning |