Re: Patch to be verbose about being unable to read ~/.pgpasss...

From: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch to be verbose about being unable to read ~/.pgpasss...
Date: 2003-06-23 07:14:47
Message-ID: 20030623071447.GV97131@perrin.int.nxad.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> I could envision a helper procedure, known only within libpq, that has
> a signature like formatNotice(PGconn* conn, const char *fmtstring, ...)
> and encapsulates the work needed to handle a format string. But I see
> no reason to push that work out to client applications.

I could make fnoticeProc private if you'd like, but that doesn't seem
smart if the user can override noticeFormat but can't with the
internal bits used by libpq... unless you're envisioning a private
method that constructs a msg for you, calls noticeProc with the buffer
as the arg, then then free()'s the result.

All regression tests pass with this case and no ABI or source
incompatabilities are introduced.

-sc

--
Sean Chittenden

Attachment Content-Type Size
patch text/plain 7.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-06-23 14:11:11 Re: Patch to be verbose about being unable to read ~/.pgpasss...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-23 06:57:02 Re: LIKE <subtable> (second attempt)