Re: Two weeks to feature freeze

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jason Earl <jason(dot)earl(at)simplot(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Date: 2003-06-21 05:22:00
Message-ID: 20030621132127.R14306-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Things like that drive the credibility of the whole thing to the floor.
> Maybe something like this should exist for Postgres, but it's not
> crash-me. Maybe the NIST compliance test is adequate.

Plus I belive the RedHat people are getting PostgreSQL through the NIST
compliance tests at the moment...I'd love to see MySQL pass them...

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-06-21 05:24:30 Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-06-21 05:19:19 Re: Two weeks to feature freeze