| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, Jason Earl <jason(dot)earl(at)simplot(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
| Date: | 2003-06-21 05:33:36 |
| Message-ID: | 24047.1056173616@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> Maybe the NIST compliance test is adequate.
> Plus I belive the RedHat people are getting PostgreSQL through the NIST
> compliance tests at the moment...I'd love to see MySQL pass them...
FWIW, the first pass of those tests is complete, and it turned up
exactly one bug that we didn't already know of (the
outer-level-aggregate bizarrity that I fixed last week ... which MySQL
wouldn't be subject to since they haven't got subselects ...)
The work is not done, because there are some tests that couldn't be run
because they were blocked by known noncompliances (such as lack of
updatable views). But I'm not getting a sense that we will learn a
whole lot from the NIST tests.
Further details will be published soon...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-06-21 05:34:45 | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-06-21 05:24:30 | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |