Re: Two weeks to feature freeze

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jason Earl <jason(dot)earl(at)simplot(dot)com>, Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Date: 2003-06-21 05:19:19
Message-ID: 20030621131832.B14306-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I don't have a lot of faith in huge automated test efforts. They're
> great at ensuring you don't make the same mistakes you made once before,
> but in my experience the nastiest bugs are the ones you haven't seen
> before and would never in a million years have dreamed to test for.
> Thus, the best test team is a bunch of people doing unplanned things
> with the software, on a wide variety of platforms...

Which is why I never use a .0 release of PostgreSQL :)

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-06-21 05:22:00 Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Previous Message Dann Corbit 2003-06-21 05:19:12 Re: Two weeks to feature freeze