Re: [HACKERS] plperl Safe restrictions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: John Hansen <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plperl Safe restrictions
Date: 2004-12-01 22:23:34
Message-ID: 20023.1101939814@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Uh, what was the TODO here? I forgot.

I think we already did what we decided was safe there.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-12-01 22:30:57 Re: New compile warnings for inheritance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-12-01 22:22:14 Re: New compile warnings for inheritance

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Jowett 2004-12-01 22:31:59 Re: libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-12-01 22:20:57 Re: [HACKERS] plperl Safe restrictions