Re: [HACKERS] plperl Safe restrictions

Uh, what was the TODO here? I forgot.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

John Hansen wrote:
> > I think it is *way* too late in the dev cycle to be proposing this.
> > Maybe it should be a TODO item - I at least don't have time even to
> > think about the implications os using these pragmas. The effect of the
> > first is achievable via an environment setting, I believe.
> >
> > If you need these badly enough, use plperlu where there are no
> > restrictions to overcome - the big problem is that 'use anything'
> > requires that we enable the 'require' op, and that is certainly not
> > going to happen without a great deal of thought.
>
> Fair enough, was just a suggestion as they seem obviously useful, even
> to the non-superuser plperl programmer.
>
> TODO item would suffice :)
>
> ... John
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073