| From: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, manfred(at)colorfullife(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE |
| Date: | 2004-12-01 22:31:59 |
| Message-ID: | 41AE465F.7060605@opencloud.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> If the C library does support queued signals then we will read the
> existing SIGPIPE condition and leave our own signal in the queue. This
> is no problem to the extent that one pending SIGPIPE looks just like
> another --- does anyone know of platforms where there is additional info
> carried by a SIGPIPE event?
POSIX.1b / SA_SIGINFO? SIGPIPE does not fill much of siginfo_t, but the
3rd handler arg has the interrupted execution context.
-O
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Manfred Spraul | 2004-12-01 22:35:20 | Re: libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-12-01 22:30:57 | Re: New compile warnings for inheritance |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Manfred Spraul | 2004-12-01 22:35:20 | Re: libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-01 22:23:34 | Re: [HACKERS] plperl Safe restrictions |