On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:25:17AM +0100, James Adams wrote:
> Yea it would be easier to have everything in one table filling unused with
> nulls, but I was trying to avoid that because of the wasted space.
> But I think I'll do it that way after all :~]
> Thanks for your help
Don't fret too much about the wasted space: NULL fields set a bit in
a bitmask in the header of the on-disk tuple, so they take up _no_
storage at all.
Ross