From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | cgg007(at)yahoo(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: FIFO Queue Problems |
Date: | 2002-11-01 16:51:01 |
Message-ID: | 26900.1036169461@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-sql |
Chris Gamache <cgg007(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> I have a program that claims a row for itself
> my $processid = $$;
> my $sql_update = <<EOS;
> UPDATE fifo
> set status=$processid
> WHERE id = (SELECT min(id) FROM fifo WHERE status=0);
> EOS
> The problem occurrs when two of the processes grab the exact same row at the
> exact same instant.
Probably the best fix is to do it this way:
BEGIN;
LOCK TABLE fifo IN EXCLUSIVE MODE;
UPDATE ... as above ...
COMMIT;
The exclusive lock will ensure that only one process claims a row
at a time (while not preventing concurrent SELECTs from the table).
This way you don't need to worry about retrying.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-01 16:51:48 | Re: pg_restore error |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2002-11-01 16:48:06 | Re: my.cnf to postgresql.conf Conversion |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2002-11-01 16:54:07 | Re: FIFO Queue Problems |
Previous Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2002-11-01 16:37:35 | Re: Selecting * from the base table but getting the inheriteds |